Nine states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana since 2012, but all of those states have been in the West or the Northeast. This year, with marijuana legalization on the ballot in Michigan as well as North Dakota, legal weed could make a heartland breakthrough.
Similarly, medical marijuana’s rise to acceptance continues, and this year, Missouri and Utah look set to join the ranks.
Two of these states — Missouri and North Dakota — also have incumbent Democratic senators up for reelection in tough campaigns this fall. Whether voters motivated by marijuana could help Claire McCaskill and Heidi Heitkamp retain their seats remains to be seen, but pot at the polls will generate interest among more liberal voters.
We could see New Jersey move quickly and legalize weed via the legislature sometime in the next two months, but barring that, it looks like we’ll see at least one, and quite possibly two, new marijuana legalization states come election day and, most likely, two more medical marijuana states.
Here we go:
Michigan is poised to become marijuana legalization’s Midwest breakout state. The Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol has qualified a marijuana legalization initiative, Proposal 1, for the November ballot.
The measure would legalize the possession up to 2.5 ounces of pot for personal use and up to 10 ounces at home, as well as allowing for the personal cultivation of up to 12 plants and the fruits of that harvest. It also creates a system of taxed and regulated marijuana commerce, with a 10 percent excise tax at the retail level in addition to the 6 percent sales tax. The measure would give cities and counties the option of allowing pot businesses or not.
The initiative looks well-positioned to win in November. A February poll had support for legalization in Michigan at 57 percent, while a March poll came in at 61 percent. The most recent poll, from May, had support holding steady at 61 percent. Those are the kinds of polling numbers initiative and referendum experts like to see at the beginning of the campaign because they suggest that even with the inevitable erosion of support in the face of opposition attacks, the measure still has a big enough cushion to pull off a victory.
Missouri voters will be able to choose from not one, not two, but three separate medical marijuana measures when they go to the polls in November. Two are constitutional amendments; one is a statutory initiative that could more easily be modified by the legislature.
Amendment 2, sponsored by New Approach Missouri, would allow doctors to recommend medical cannabis for any condition they see fit. Registered patients and caregivers would be allowed to grow up to six marijuana plants and purchase up to four ounces from dispensaries per month. Medical cannabis sales at dispensaries would be taxed at 4 percent.
Amendment 3, sponsored by Find the Cures, would let doctors recommend medical marijuana to patients who have any of a specific list of qualifying conditions (while regulators would be able to add more conditions in the future). The retail sales tax on medical marijuana would be set at the much higher rate of 15 percent. Funds would be used to support research with the aim of developing cures and treatments for cancer and other diseases.
Proposition C, backed by Missourians for Patient Care, also outlines a list of specific conditions that would qualify patients to legally use medical cannabis. Sales would be taxed at 2 percent.
An August poll conducted by TJP strategies had support for amending the state constitution to allow medical marijuana at 54 percent.
That there are three separate measures on the ballot could lead to some confusion. If multiple ballot measures on the same topic pass, the one with the most votes generally prevails. But because in this case two of the measures are constitutional amendments and one is a statutory measure, if the statutory measure gets more votes than either of the amendments, but at least one of them passes, it could be up to the state’s court system to figure out which goes into effect.
While there is nothing stopping voters from voting “yes” on all three measures, there are also concerns that the multiplicity of options could result in splitting the pro-medical marijuana vote, with some voting “yes” on only one measure and “no” on the others. In this election, when it comes to medical marijuana, Missouri may have too much of a good thing.
The winds of change are blowing across the northern prairies. Just two years ago, North Dakota voters approved a medical marijuana initiative, and this year, a grassroots group, Legalize ND, managed to get enough signatures to get Measure 3, the Marijuana Legalization and Automatic Expungement initiative, on the November ballot.
This is a radical initiative. It would legalize all forms of marijuana for adults by removing marijuana, THC, and hashish from the state’s controlled substance schedules, and it sets no limits on the amount of marijuana people could possess or how many plants they grow. It also provides for the automatic expungement of criminal convictions for anyone convicted of a marijuana-related crime that would be legal under the measure.
And it does not create a framework for regulated marijuana sales, nor does it set any taxes. Creating a system of taxed and regulated marijuana commerce would be up to the state legislature.
North Dakota is a deep red state — Donald Trump got more than twice as many votes as Hillary Clinton in 2016 — but the only poll done so far has the initiative leading. The June poll, commissioned by Legalize ND and conducted by the Florida-based Kitchen Group, had the initiative winning 46 percent to 39 percent, with 15 percent undecided.
That’s good but not great news for Legalize ND. Yes, the initiative is leading, but the conventional wisdom among initiative and referendum watchers is that campaigns should be starting off with at least 60 percent support — the assumption being that inevitable organized opposition is going to eat away at support levels in the final weeks of the campaign.
Sponsored by the Utah Patients Coalition, the medical marijuana statutory initiative, Proposition 2, has qualified for the November ballot. The bottom-up effort comes after the state legislature has refused to advance meaningful medical marijuana legislation.
Under the measure, people who suffer from one of a list of designated qualifying medical conditions could receive a medical marijuana card with a physician’s recommendation. That would entitle them to possess up to two ounces of marijuana or any amount of a marijuana product with up to 10 grams of THC. Patients could not grow their own unless they live more than 100 miles from a dispensary. And the patients cannot smoke marijuana.
The measure has received opposition from the Church of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), but even church members don’t appear to be heading the leadership on this one. A Utah Policy poll released Tuesday has support for the measure at 64 percent. Among Mormons, the church’s active opposition has swayed only “very active” church members, who now narrowly oppose the measure. But “somewhat active” and “former” Mormons both overwhelmingly support it. It looks like medical marijuana is coming to the Land of Deseret.
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license from StopTheDrugWar.org and was first published here.
Tags: ballot initiatives, Claire McCaskill, Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, Election 2018, Heidi Heitkamp, Legalize ND, Legalize North Dakota, LegalizeND, marijuana legalization, MI Legalize, Michigan, michigan cannabis coalition, Michigan marijuana legalization, Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act, Missouri Amendment 2 (2018), Missouri medical marijuana, New Approach Missouri, North Dakota marijuana legalization, Proposal 1, tax and regulate, The Utah Medical Cannabis Act, Utah, Utah medical marijuana, Utah Patients Coalition